Publishers: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagreb, Croatia  |  Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Nitra, Slovakia  |  Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Georgikon Campus, Keszthely, Hungary  |  Agricultural University Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria  |  University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Agriculture and Technology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic  |  Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Bydgoszcz, Poland  |  University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj - Napoca, Romania  |  University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Agronomy Čačak, Čačak, Serbia  |  Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/17.3.1774

Original scientific paper

Yield and quality responses of drip-irrigated spinach to different irrigation quantities in a semi-arid region with a high altitude

2016, 17 (3)   p. 763-777

Yasemin KUSLU, Ustun SAHIN, Fatih KIZILOGLU, Memnune SENGUL

Abstract

The effect of different irrigation quantities on the growth, marketable yield, crop quality (antioxidant activity, mineral and total phenolic content) and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) of spinach grown in a semi-arid region of high altitude (1795 m a.s.l.) was determined. Plants were irrigated with three different irrigation quantities which determined considering 100 (I1), 85 (I2) and 70% (I3) of the evaporation obtained from a Class A pan. Irrigation quantities in the I1, I2 and I3 treatments as two years average were 290, 264.3 and 238.6 mm, respectively. The I1 treatment provided the highest growth, marketable yield (28.06 t*ha-1) and IWUE (9.7 kg*m-3). However, mineral and total phenolic content and antioxidant activity in the leaves of spinach were significantly higher under lower water application conditions. The I2 treatment resulted with the highest antioxidant activity and content of N, K, Mg, Na, Fe, Cu and total phenolics. As a result of the study, I1 treatment in spinach production could be suitable for water sufficient regions due to higher yield and IWUE. However, I2 treatment may be more appropriate for water scarce semi-arid regions of high altitude for obtaining higher minerals and antioxidant activity.

Keywords

antioxidant activity, irrigation water use efficiency, marketable yield, mineral and total phenolic content

 Download      Find similar journal articles

Share article

email    linkedin    facebook    twitter

  • Sign in

    If you are an existing user, please sign in. New users may register.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Got it